Full-game total
- Consensus total
- 48.0
- Books
- 11
- Movement
- −0.5 from 48.5
- Nearest key total
- 47 · 1 point away
Movement is measured from the first observation, Sun, Jul 12, 5:26 AM EDT.
Reconstructed historical example · frozen pregame inputs
Built only from inputs that existed before kickoff. This archived example does not update.
Inputs frozen as of Tue, Sep 8, 1:55 AM EDT · kickoff Sun, Sep 13, 1:00 PM EDT
A reconstructed pregame example, built from historical market data and governed model inputs that existed before kickoff, shown the way the member Desk presents these views. It is not a record of what members saw at that moment.
Consensus across the books tracked, observed Mon, Sep 7, 4:06 AM EDT.
Movement is measured from the first observation, Sun, Jul 12, 5:26 AM EDT.
Consensus prices are market context — what the books were pricing. They are not an FDI view.
Each view states when it was generated. Not every game has every view, and nothing is estimated in the place of a missing one.
46.2
Generated Sat, Sep 5, 6:45 PM EDT
FDI's model view is not an FDI Position. It describes what the model expects for the game total, not what to do about it.
Generated Tue, Sep 8, 1:55 AM EDT
FDI's moneyline model view is not an FDI Position. It reports a probability, not what to do about it.
66 / 100
The Intel Score is a 0–100 measure of how strongly the available evidence supports the way a read was built.
An Intel Score describes how a read was built, not whether FDI holds a position on the game. It is not a win, cover, or hit probability, and not an expected return.
Lean · Indianapolis Colts (home)
Directional model context, not an FDI Position or an instruction.
Market observed Mon, Sep 7, 4:06 AM EDT
In this frozen reconstruction, "current" means current at the Lean evaluation instant, with the market observed at the time shown above.
A Lean is a mechanical comparison, not a forecast of the result. FDI takes the win probability its frozen moneyline model produced before the season, compares it with the latest captured approved-book market, and reports a Lean only when at least 3 approved two-sided books are present, the difference is at least 5.0 percentage points, and the best current approved price still sits below the model's own probability. The rule was fixed in advance for the 2026 season and is not tuned to past results.
Moneyline Lean is separate from FDI Position.
Members see governed views like these on the Desk for games where eligible reads exist.
Create your accountFictional demonstration. Harbor City and Ridgeline are invented teams, the players are invented, and every value below is frozen demonstration data. It is not a real game, not an FDI projection, and it does not update. It shows how the member Player Props view is laid out.
Members see one board per game, organized by player. For each supported family — passing yards, receptions — a row shows the FDI projection, frozen two hours before kickoff, beside the same player's current sportsbook line, and the difference between them. The difference is simple arithmetic, not a read.
| Player | Passing yards |
|---|---|
| Owen CalderHBC · QB | FDI projection 241.6Market 236.5Difference, projection minus line, +5.1 |
| Luis FerranteRDG · QB | FDI projection 219.8Market 224.5Difference, projection minus line, -4.7 |
| Player | Receptions |
|---|---|
| Theo MarshHBC · WR | FDI projection 5.8Market 5.5 |
| Nate VossHBC · TE | FDI projection 4.1Market 3.5 |
| Andre KellRDG · WR | FDI projection 6.3Market 5.5 |
| Cal BrennanRDG · WR | FDI projection 3.2No current line |
| Player | Receptions |
|---|---|
| Miles OrtegaRDG · RB | FDI projection 2.9Market 2.5 |
The same quarterback, with a market observed the day before and no longer current. The line is still shown, with its time and a “not current” label, but no difference is calculated against it.
FDI projection 241.6Market 236.5 · not currentSelecting a player opens their dossier: every supported family for that player, with the line's prices, how many books quote it and when it was observed. Where a model estimates the chance of finishing above the exact number the current line is set at, the dossier shows that probability too. It is model context, not a recommendation.
Members see governed views like these on the Desk for games where eligible reads exist, alongside the market's own state.